Monday, August 1, 2022

SKULL THE SLAYER #3

"TUMULT IN THE TOWER OF TIME!"
Writer/Editor: Marv Wolfman | Pencils: Steve Gan
Inkers: Pablo Marcos & Steve Gan
Letters: Irv Watanabe | Colors: Michele Wolfman

The Plot: Skull wrestles with a prehistoric beast until it bucks him off, after which he, Ann, Jeff, and Doctor Corey continue their exploration of the prehistoric world. After being nearly trampled by a herd of stampeding dinosaurs, Skull leads the group to see what spooked the animals. They come across a field of skeletal remains tied to posts. From there, they move on to a huge tower, which offers glimpses of various time periods -- a different one on each level.

As they gaze into the tower, the group is attacked by a T-Rex. Skull and Jeff fight the creature, while Corey slips away. Skull figure out that the Tyrannosaur is a robot, and destroys it. Then the group hears Corey scream. They follow him and find that he has stumbled into ancient Egypt, where he's been captured by a Pharaoh's soldiers.

Continuity Notes: Not many in this issue, though it should be noted that Skull's corpse-robbing ways have evidently rubbed off on Ann and Jeff. At Ann's suggestion, all three of them pilfer clothing from the skeletons near the tower. Doctor Corey, however, remains in his normal clothes.

As for the skeletons themselves -- they're from a number of different time periods, and there are extraterrestrials among them (and it is from the alien-but-humanoid bodies that our heroes procure their new cothes). Later, when the group finds the tower, Jeff notes that it is covered in alien writing identical to that which was in the cave where the primitive humans worshipped an alien corpse.
My Thoughts: As of this issue, Marv Wolfman drastically, drastically pulls back on his third-person captions, and suddenly the comic is readable! There's only the sparsest use of such narrative boxes here, just enough to move the story along (and yes, one of them does casually refer to Skull in the first person as "man", but compared with the previous two issues, that's nothing). If Wolfman had written the series this way from the beginning, I would've liked it a lot more! Further, he moves the story along nicely here, revealing his explanation of the "mystery" of the Bermuda Triangle, and it's pretty cool.

The weird thing is, I wonder if Wolfman himself perhaps realized that SKULL wasn't really clicking as he might have hoped. I mean, he created the series so it should be his "baby" -- but as you'll see below, the "next issue" caption says that we're about to see "A new writer! A new approach!" next month. So Wolfman either got bored with his creation in a hurry, or forced himself to admit that maybe he wasn't the right fit for what he'd created (or that what he'd created wasn't the right fit for what Marvel wanted).
It should be noted that whatever happened, this doesn't seem to be a case of Wolfman leaving against his will, as he has set things up for the incoming writer and he will remain as the series' editor. It's a little sad though, because with his scripting deficiencies corrected, I suddenly find this a much more interesting read, and I'm a little sad to see him go -- and to see the series change direction, to whatever extent that's going to happen.

In any case, don't get too excited for that "new writer". Steve Englehart will indeed come aboard next time, bringing frequent collaborator Sal Buscema with him on art, but Englehart will write a whopping one issue of SKULL before handing the series off to its third (and ultimately final) writer, Bill Mantlo. So I hope you guys are ready for a little creative roller coaster, because it starts next week!

6 comments:

  1. Oh man, Englehart only wrote one issue? He had no time to work Mantis in then...or DID HE?

    You know how good a writer Steve Englehart is? He tells you. Repeatedly.

    Based on your reviews, and the fact that Wolfman got his start at Marvel editing their black and white magazines, I would not be shocked if Skull was meant for that line and it wound up moving to the color line for god only knows what reasons. Once a color book, Wolfman just couldn't make it work (arguably he couldn't make it work PERIOD) as a traditional Marvel Comic and he left to see if someone else could salvage it. 1970s Marvel, man, strange stuff just HAPPENED.

    I rather do like the shot of the different time periods, that's the kind of clever it seems like this book could have used.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good point about the B&W line and, well, all of it really.

      Delete
    2. Englehart does not use Mantis in SKULL, but that's probably only because he had already written her out in GIANT-SIZE AVENGERS #4 by this point!

      It's funny; I remember finding Englehart's website years ago and reading his thoughts on all the various series he worked on over the years, and I came away thinking he had a larger ego than John Byrne -- which is an astonishing feat!

      Interesting thought about this possibly being conceived as a black-and-white series... it does feel like a better fit for that line, now that you mention it.

      As far as the different time periods go, I'll have a lot more to say about that in upcoming installments, but I really think the "Tower of Time" was intended by Wolfman as a major centerpiece of the series, but it's casually discarded by Mantlo as soon as he comes aboard.

      (I also suspect that Mantlo interpreted it incorrectly from what Wolfman intended, as I will also discuss in upcoming posts.)

      Delete

  2. You’re absolutely right about Wolfman pulling way back on the amount of narration here, and yet just as with the previous issue my patience for it is worn nearly from the jump. I penned my first comment on your last post after getting halfway through the splash page. This go-’round, while there’s far less prose, the ridiculously hip/casual tone is almost insurmountably ridiculous.

    I was totally surprised by the revelation of the tiers of time in that tower — say that three times fast — so I must not’ve more than lightly flipped through the issues of this series I picked up a while back. When I think of all the (deserved) grief Marvel got at retailer conferences back in the early-mid ’90s for its failure to keep collected editions in print and dearth of backlist overall, it’s amazing to me that a Skull the Slayer TPB exists.

    The lettercol says that Wolfman is finding himself far too busy with his duties as editor of the Marvel line, while still writing Daredevil and Tomb of Dracula, to continue on this series. Of course that’s not incompatible with your proposed reasons why he might’ve handed it off to someone else. I am curious to see how it changes under subsequent hands.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Modern Marvel is a vastly different company than 90s Marvel, that's for sure... though I think the market is vastly different as well, with trade paperbacks of EVERYTHING being ubiquitous. Plus when you have something as self-contained as SKULL -- basically a ten-issue story and that's the end -- I suppose it's an easy candidate for collections.

      Though I agree with you that in principle based on its obscurity and quality, it's incredibly odd this series has a trade paperback when there are likely many other more deserving things that don't (yet).

      Oh yeah, this was during Wolfman's tenure as editor-in-chief... understandable he needed to drop something, and I'd rather it be SKULL than DRACULA! (I've never read Wolfman's DD, though, so I have no idea how that compared with SKULL. I do know he created Bullseye, at least.)

      Delete
    2. I remember when it was a big deal if something was released on compact disc. 8^) No question about Marvel and the comics market being vastly different from nigh on 30 years past. I just can’t believe how long ago that was.

      Delete