Monday, March 4, 2024

DETECTIVE COMICS #505

"WEREWOLF MOON"
Writer Gerry Conway | Artists: Don Newton & Dan Adkins
Letterer: Ben Oda | Colorist: Adrienne Roy | Editor: Dick Giordano

The Plot: Inside a hospital room, a woman pleads for Batman's help to save the life of her daughter, who is dying of leukemia and who needs bone marrow transplant from her brother. Out in the hospital corridor, Batman and Commissioner Gordon discuss the identity of the girl's brother -- he is Anthony Lupus, a werewolf apparently killed years earlier. But Gordon reveals to Batman that Lupus may yet live, in Alaska. The Darknight Detective heads north and, as Bruce Wayne, recruits a guide from the local EPA office to help him find Lupus. They locate a wooden shack in the wilderness, but find it empty. Then, as they wait, the werewolf bursts in and attacks. Bruce drives it out the door, and the next morning his guide leaves.

Bruce changes to Batman and hunts Lupus, eventually finding and fighting him under the full moon. The Caped Crusader wins and Lupus turns back to normal. Batman holds him captive in a silver net for one more night of the full moon before the pair returns to Gotham City.

Continuity Notes: Per Batman's exposition and a footnote, Anthony Lupus first appeared in BATMAN #255, by Len Wein and Neal Adams, where he was a star athlete mutated by the fiendish Professor Milo. Batman believed Lupus was killed by a lightning bolt, but apparently Gordon has known for a couple of months that he may be alive and has elected not to mention it to Batman.
Strangely, Batman says that he fought Lupus "six years ago" -- which is more-or-less true in terms of publication time; the original story was published in 1974 -- but which makes no sense in terms of the sliding timeline, when one considered Robin was in college back then, and that would put him somewhere in his mid-twenties at this point if that were the case.

Mayoral candidate and city councilman Athur Reeves puts in another appearance to harass Batman with the aid of a TV news crew. But this time, already rattled by the Lupus situation, Batman loses his cool and smacks Reeves aside, making the evening news and the next morning's headlines.

My Thoughts: It's step back up in quality for Gerry Conway, bearing out my theory that, with the assistance of Roy Thomas, he was merely phoning it in on the past couple issues of BATMAN. Mind you, this isn't the cream of Conway's crop; indeed it's fairly lackluster as far as the main story goes. Bringing back Lupus seems unnecessary following his original story, which was a decent done-in-one with a definitive ending. And (Bat)man vs. nature is nearly always a compelling hook in any genre. Yet somehow, things don't quite "click" here.
Nonteheless, even if the plot doesn't quite reach the level of Conway's better previous efforts, his scripting is at the top of his game here, and the return of the Reeves sub-plot, brief though it may be, is welcome. I can't say this is a true return to form, but it gives me hope for upcoming installments. Again, like I said last week, I've read that this is a very good run, so I'm hopeful it's just a little bumpy getting off the ground -- and with forty-four combined issues of BATMAN and DETECTIVE remaining after this one, I also hope that I'm not still waiting for things to "get good" in another few months!

And to that point, you may have noticed that I'm not covering these BATMAN and DETECTIVE COMICS issues in the order in which they were released, but rather in chronological story order as presented in the TALES OF THE BATMAN: GERRY CONWAY volumes. So this is our first of three DETECTIVE issues in a row, following from two BATMAN issues in a row. I know, again from what I've read online elsewhere, that Conway will eventually sync the titles up, treating them as basically one bi-weekly series. It's a format he would use a few years later (to resounding success in my own opinion) when he returned to Marvel and wrote both SPECTACULAR SPIDER-MAN and WEB OF SPIDER-MAN concurrently. And I find myself wondering if that point, when BATMAN and DETECTIVE become joined at the hip, is when this run truly clicks and takes off. I guess we'll find out soon enough!

5 comments:


  1. The bright green on “Not a” is just a mite too loud for my taste but I always enjoy seeing that Banshee figure.

    I disagree on the return of the Arthur Reeves subplot, which doesn’t thrill me on its own terms and IMO clashes with / detracts from the focus of the main story in some way I can’t define. The callback to Lupus is a bit of a shift from the aggressively stand-alone tales in those Batman issues just covered yet still feels rather of a piece — a piece that belongs in a slightly earlier era alongside Haney, Robbins, even O’Neil.

    Having already joked about mashing up an HBO series and DC property for True Detective Comics a couple of years ago, by the way, I loved reading the perfect springboard for Darknight Country. 8^)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks! It's maybe a bit bright for me too, but I've just never taken the time to mute it.

      Funny thing about that Banshee -- I had to make it myself! The upper half is indeed from a picture of Banshee by Byrne and Austin in a panel where he's only visible from the waist up. The lower half is from another illustration by the pair elsewhere in the X-Men run, and I don't think was originally Banshee (in fact I'm almost positive it's Angel; I can practically see the picture in my head, but can't place the context). I traced and colored the whole thing to make it as seamless as possible. I think since it's reduced so small, it worked fairly well!

      Here is is in high resolution. I think it was a fairly small background image to begin with, judging by the thickness of the lines, but it was the exact pose I wanted, and I knew it would look fine reduced.

      And then since Banshee gets the spotlight for the month, I have Iceman taking his place in the "corner box", and as much as I like how Banshee turned out Iceman sort of bugs me -- I couldn't find a decent image of the guy drawn by Byrne and Austin since he never appeared in the X-Men run outside of the flashback issue 138 -- so I had to use a Byrne/Layton Iceman from HULK ANNUAL #7 -- and it's pretty clearly more Layton than Byrne in that image.

      I could've used a straight Byrne Iceman from X-MEN: THE HIDDEN YEARS, but I tried to keep all those corner box heads roughly contemporaneous in terms of the original artwork -- 1970s to early 1980s at the latest -- so the style would match. The only exception is She-Hulk, taken from Byrne's second go-round doing Avengers corner box heads in the late 80s, because I really think it captures her character better than his original take from the early 80s.

      (The "Halloween heads" I use in October are a totally different matter, though -- they're from all different parts of Byrne's career.)

      That mocked up Superman cover is hilarious, by the way -- even if I'm not all familiar with the accents, there are some things that transcend a need for familiarity and are funny regardless!

      Delete

    2. I see what you mean about Iceman and the poor guy looks a bit sheepish about not quite fitting in himself. (The “Halloween heads” are so much fun it’s kind-of a shame they don’t come around more than once a year, but obviously they wouldn’t be quite as special then.) I was just trying to figure out who besides Iceman could take Banshee’s spot for March and realized that even when he was in costume for a spell, well after the era you’re inspired by, I don’t think Xavier was ever in the corner box.

      Delete
    3. Yeah, Professor X appeared above the X-Men logo in the Kirby days, but that's about it as far as I think think of -- and a Jack Kirby Xavier would look way out of place with a bunch of John Byrne faces!

      That said, a lot of the above were not originally in corner boxes. Phoenix was a convention sketch by Byrne and Austin circa 1979/80. Power Man, Iron Fist, Daredevil, Spider-Man, and Nick Fury are all interior art by Byrne and other inkers.

      But the two biggest exceptions are Moon Knight and Adam Warlock -- Warlock was not even Warlock! I couldn't find a good high resolution straight-ahead view of the character drawn by Byrne, so I took Byrne's corner box head for Falcon, who had a very similar facial structure to the way Byrne drew Warlock in MARVEL TEAM-UP, and used that as the basic shape of the head. But he has the nose, mouth and chin details from Byrne's Swordsman head, eyes taken from an extreme closeup in the MTU issue that didn't otherwise have the rest of the head, and the hair from a convention sketch by Byrne -- which really didn't match the rest of the heads, though I feel like nowadays I could do a better job of recreating it and making it work. Maybe it's time to revisit this thing!

      Moon Knight, meanwhile, is the only one who isn't even drawn by Byrne -- he's from the WEST COAST AVENGERS corner box and I think might be Al Milgrom. But he's so plain that I figured it would work.

      So I guess the point is that I make exceptions where necessary. I should find a good interior Xavier and see what I can do with it. I'm shocked he never occurred to me; I would probably rather have him there than Kitty!

      Delete

    4. // Phoenix was a convention sketch //

      I know that exact sketch, or at least one very much like it, from 1980’s The Art of John Byrne — right down to her slightly crosseyed gaze.

      Delete