NOTE

Monday, May 2, 2022

INVADERS #34

"HE WHO DESTROYS!"
Concept/Editor: Roy Thomas | Guest Writer: Don Glut
Artists/Illustrators: Alan Kupperberg & Frank Springer
Letters: Joe Rosen | Colors: Nel Yomtov | Consulting Editor: Jim Shooter

The Plot: The Invaders are startled to read in the newspapers that the mighty Destroyer has defected to the Nazis. Then, even as they discuss the situation, a radio news report states that the Destroyer is attacking the London Bridge with a Nazi fighter plane. The Invaders set out to stop him. At the bridge, the Sub-Mariner and Human Torch disembark Namor's flagship to assist with rescue operations, while Captain America pilots the craft in pursuit of the Destroyer's plane.

The plane lands at a castle on the moors, where Union Jack and Spitfire bail out as Cap maintains a holding pattern. The sibling Invaders, having deduced that the "Destroyer" is an imposter, enter the castle, with Union Jack insisting that he must unmask the villain masquerading as his friend. So, while Spitfire searches the castle for the real Destroyer, Roger Aubrey, Union Jack battles his impersonator. Spitfire finds Roger, who explains that he was captured behind Nazi lines by Master Man, who now wears his costume. Meanwhile, Master Man defeats and reveals himself to Union Jack. Master Man's three henchmen, who had been knocked out by Spitfire, come around and flee the castle rather than face the Invaders. When Master Man sees their plane taking off, he leaps onto its wing with Union Jack captive -- but U.J. struggles free and leaps from the plane. Spitfire creates an updraft to slow his fall, and Roger catches him.

Later, back at Falsworth Manor, Captain America invites the Destroyer to join the Invaders again, but once more he refuses, though he allows that he would be willing to work with them if they ever need him, as an "honorary" Invader. Then, moments after the Destroyer leaves, Lord Falsworth presents Captain America with a message from President Roosevelt, summoning Cap, Namor, and the Human Torch back to America immediately.

Continuity Notes: A footnote reminds us that Roger assumed Brian Falsworth's guise as the Destroyer in issue 26. We later get another footnote to that issue when Cap reminds him of the invitation to join the Invaders.

The opening scene depicts Brian and Jacqueline Falsworth in their civilian clothes. Then, throughout the issue, they each remove their masks more than once. And of course, the Human Torch and Namor never wear masks to begin with. But for reasons I will never understand, Captain America always keeps his mask on in this series. It's not to hide a secret identity, mind you -- everyone regularly calls him "Steve" when they're off-duty. But he just never removes the frikkin' cowl, even when he's just sitting around Falsworth Manor reading the newspaper, literally during tea time! As I noted recently, I'm pretty sure we've only seen Steve Rogers' face twice in this entire series, not counting any flashbacks to his origin. It's getting into THE TICK-level weirdness at this point.
Union Jack uses his new electrical powers, which he speculates were created by Mjölnir's energy interacting with his super soldier serum variant, several times in this issue. Now -- you may recall that in the previous insallment, Thor wiped the Invaders' minds of his meeting with them. This was just after U.J. demonstrated the new power in front of all the Invaders, and he speculated that he would soon have no memory of how he came by them, thanks to Thor's enchantment. But here, he surprises the Invaders with his new ability, while also stating that he's had the power ever since he "came into contact" with Thor's hammer.

So what exactly happened? Do the Invaders remember having some adventure involving the hammer of Thor, but not of actually meeting Thor? They clearly seem to have forgotten that they ever saw Brian demonstrate the power when he first acquired it, but it seems to me that, if anything, they should remember that but not remember anything about Thor. (And of course the simple answer here is that Roy Thomas wrote the previous issue and Don Glut wrote this one, so there's a discrepancy. But why Thomas, in his capacity as this issue's editor, didn't catch and correct the problem will remain a mystery.)

As I noted when they first appeared, Brian and Roger were eventually revealed to have been lovers, not mere "friends" as stated in these INVADERS issues. And also as I said then, I'm not sure when or where the ret-con first came about. It's hard to tell from their earlier appearance whether Thomas intended this to be the case. Likewise, I can't tell from the sequence below whether Glut is going for some subtext in his script, or if I'm just projecting it there based on what I already know:
My Thoughts: I like the Destroyer, so it's fun to have him back. I enjoy Master Man, who at this point is the Invaders' most recurring villain, so seeing him in action -- and against Spitfire and Union Jack, with whom he's barely interacted up to this point -- is fun, too. Overall, this is a fine issue, and the unmasking of Master Man as the fake Destroyer works well enough as a surprise. I think I tumbled to it only a page or so before the unmasking, which isn't bad. (Though I would argue that's in part due to Alan Kupperberg "cheating" a bit: when in the Destroyer costume, Master Man is drawn with much less bulk than usual. But hey, that's comics!)

Speaking of the artwork, this is a weird one on that front. I commented recently that Kupperberg and/or Frank Springer had stopped doing a "Frank Robbins impression" and that the style had changed to what I assumed to be a more natural Kupperberg effort. But as of this issue, the Robbins look is back in full force. I would chalk it up to this being another inventory story, drawn before they changed their style, but it clearly isn't since it continues directly from the prior issue with Union Jack's new super powers illustrated several time in the artwork (plus it cliffhangers into next issue as well). So I dunno what happened with the artwork, unless it's as simple as Thomas telling the artists that he wanted them to go back to the Robbins style.
But if that was the case, it would quickly become a moot point. This is Frank Springer's final issue as inker. He came aboard fairly early on, and meshed with penciler Frank Robbins much better than the prior inker, Vince Colletta. And he kept things consistent after Robbins departed a while back. But his tour has come to an end, and he will be succeeded by a rotating cast of brush-jockeys going forward, all working with Alan Kupperberg as the regular penciler for the remainder of the series (which is only seven more issues at this point).

3 comments:

  1. Man, if those two panels didn't have the intent to suggest those two were a couple, I'd love to see what they'd have come up with if they'd been trying, because whew, that ain't subtext there.

    I'm pretty sure this is the last issue of Invaders I actually read, mostly because by this time I'd moved from where newsstand distribution allowed me to get Invaders every month to "maybe this 7-11 has it." In this day and age, with comics easy to find digitally, it seems so weird that there was a point in time where having complete runs was a modest miracle (my run of X-Men from 94 to somewhere in the 300s, which sold for a handy price, is actually miraculous given that I didn't start hitting comics stores regularly until 1984!) and sometimes you read whatever was on your shelves. That's in fact how I got started on X-Men, a local grocery store always had it! That the Invaders stuck with me this long, when, let's face it, it's an exceedingly average book at times, continues to strike me as funny. Like, in the same time frame I rarely bought Spider-man books, but I had a solid run on Invaders. Wow.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We had a local comic shop near us in the 80s, but as it was a bit of a drive, I didn't start getting out there regularly until maybe 1990 or so, when I would've been 11 -- so for the first few years of my comic reading, it was the same thing -- whatever I found on the spinner racks at 7-11 or Safeway or wherever else. That's how I read Gerry Conway's run writing SPECTACULAR SPIDER-MAN and WEB OF SPIDER-MAN circa 1988-89, which meant I missed a ton of issues. I maybe had about half the run, if even that, but I loved it regardless.

      That run is way up near the top of my list of stuff I'd like to see Marvel reprint. They gave it a half-hearted start a few years back with a volume called SPIDER-MAN: TOMBSTONE vol. 1, but beyond the fact that it never got a second volume, it was a total misfire. Conway wrote WEB and SPECTACULAR essentially as one twice-monthly series, carrying his plots back and forth between the two series. (He also has said that he wrote the books foremost as a soap opera -- he came up with his sub-plots first and then built Spider-Man stories around them, rather than vice versa, which is an approach I absolutely love for a Spidey comic.)

      Anyway, the TOMBSTONE volume collected only the SPECTACULAR side of the run, since that's where the character appeared most -- which meant you were only getting half of the overall story. It was a really poor choice on Marvel's part, and I have to imagine that, in part, led to poor sales among the already small target audience who knew how it should've been done, which scuttled any plans for a second volume.

      I would dearly love an Omnibus collecting both titles together for the duration of Conway's time writing them. Just call it SPIDER-MAN BY GERRY CONWAY, SAL BUSCEMA, AND ALEX SAVIUK. It would also be a nice companion to the SPIDER-MAN BY DAVID MICHELINIE & TODD MCFARLANE volume they published several years ago, as the Conway material was originally released alongside that stuff.

      Oh, wait -- were we talking about the Invaders?? Honestly, this isn't a bad stopping point. It's sort of the end of the Invaders as we know them. Starting next issue, they're back in the U.S.A. for the remainder of the series, and Spitfire and Union Jack are left behind in England. It is a decent storyline, though -- basically one long saga stretching through to the end of the series.

      Delete

  2. // Do the Invaders remember having some adventure involving the hammer of Thor, but not of actually meeting Thor? //

    I hadn’t thought about that but it’s perversely appealing to me.

    As I’m pretty sure I’ve mentioned before, I picked up this series far less often come the second half of its run for whatever reason. Given how much I loved it in the early days, I’m confounded by this being the first issue that I likely got off the racks since Toro’s origin and that none on the horizon are sure bets until the final issue.

    ReplyDelete