"THUNDERBALL" | "ON HER MAJESTY'S SECRET SERVICE"
December 11th, 1961 - February 10th, 1962 | June 29th, 1964 - May 15th, 1965
Written by Henry Gammidge | Illustrated by John McLusky
December 11th, 1961 - February 10th, 1962 | June 29th, 1964 - May 15th, 1965
Written by Henry Gammidge | Illustrated by John McLusky
THUNDERBALL has the peculiar distinction of being the only James Bond story developed by Ian Fleming himself with the intention that it would become a movie. In the 1950s, Fleming worked with producer Kevin McClory on a project to bring Bond to the silver screen. When the project fell by the wayside, Fleming went ahead and adapted the story they had come up with into a novel. Years later, when Bond finally did make it to the movies, producers Albert Broccoli and Harry Saltzman adapted the novel THUNDERBALL into the fourth film in the series. So essentially, THUNDERBALL was a movie treatment adapted into a novel, which was then adapted into a screenplay! As such, one might expect the original THUNDERBALL, adapted into this comic strip, to sync up fairly closely with the film -- and at least initially, that's true. Both versions open with Bond declared unfit for field duty by M, and sent to recuperate at a spa called Shrublands. There, he encounters a mystery man named Count Lippe, who tries to kill Bond when the agent shows too much interest in the Count's Tong tattoo. Bond reciprocates, giving Lippe a near-death experience, and then returns to work at MI6. Meanwhile, the Special Executive for Counterintelligence, Terrorism, Revenge, and Extortion -- SPECTRE -- holds a meeting to discuss their latest plot: stealing a NATO plane transporting two nuclear missiles. SPECTRE's agent on the inside, co-pilot Giuseppe Petacchi, kills the plane's crew and hijacks it, ditching it in the Atlantic ocean near the Bahamas after SPECTRE takes the bombs.
And then -- after twenty-eight days of strips dedicated the Shrublands opening, eighteen days of SPECTRE talkling about their plan, and twelve days of Petacchi carrying that plan out, the remainder of the THUNDERBALL storyline is resolved perfunctorily in six more days! Bond and Felix Leiter, suddenly in the Bahamas, find the plane. MI6 has deduced that SPECTRE is behind it. Bond leads an attack on the Disco Volante, a yacht owned by SPECTRE's Number One, Emilio Largo. He's injured in the fight and wakes up in a hospital, where Leiter tells him the bombs were recovered, but SPECTRE's leader, Ernst Stavro Blofeld, escaped. The end. You may be wondering what on Earth happened. The answer is that occasional scourge of all serialized fiction, premature cancellation. According to Wikipedia:
"In 1962 the Daily Express abruptly cancelled their agreement with Ian Fleming when [newspaper publisher] Lord Beaverbrook and Fleming disputed the rights to the James Bond short story "The Living Daylights". Fleming had sold the rights to the Sunday Times, a rival newspaper — upsetting Beaverbrook into terminating his business relationship with Fleming. The dispute abruptly ended the comic strip adaptation of THUNDERBALL. Additional panels were added later for its syndication to other newspapers, and to expand and conclude the story. Beaverbrook and Fleming later settled their differences, and the comic strip serial would continue in 1964 with ON HER MAJESTY'S SECRET SERVICE."So there you have it. It's a little annoying to me on a personal level, because THUNDERBALL my favorite Bond film. I know nearly eveyone gives that honor, at least insofar as the Sean Connery films go, to GOLDFINGER. But for me, it's been THUNDERBALL since I was a teenager, and THUNDERBALL it remains. I was looking forward to reading the comic strip's adaptation of the novel! The strip was shaping up for a really nice storyline, devoting a lot of time to the setup, leading me to expect a drawn out, faithful adaptaion.
(Though I will admit that THUNDERBALL in its original form, whether novel or any direct adaptation thereof, will always suffer a bit in my mind when compared with the movie, simply due to the original book's lack of SPECTRE agent Fiona Volpe, portrayed onscreen by the stunning Luciana Paluzzi as the gold standard by which all Bond's "bad girls" must be judged.)
And so we move along to ON HER MAJESTY's SECRET SERVICE. As noted above, the comic strip was cancelled for over a year before it returned, but when it did, the original creative team -- writer Henry Gammidge and artist John McLusky -- remained intact. and as OHMSS opens, narration tell us that during the year-plus we haven't seen him, Bond has been scouring the world for Blofeld. Thus, this next story opens with Bond preparing to resign from the secret service over what he perceives as a waste of his talents. But first, he goes to the Casino Royale to blow off some steam. There, he meets a woman who infatuates him -- Teresa "Tracy" di Vicenzo. Soon after, Bond meets Tracy's father as well -- a Corsican gangster named Marc-Ange Draco. Draco explains to Bond that Tracy has a death wish following her husband leaving her and her child dying, but that she seems to genuinely love Bond. Thus, Draco wants Bond to marry Tracy. Bond isn't necessarily against the idea, but first he wants to finish his mission to find Blofeld -- which, in the strip, sort of comes out of nowehere. at the start of this arc, Bond firmly believes Blofeld is dead, yet when he meets Draco, he casually asks the gangster if he can help locate the terrorist -- and Draco comes through, telling Bond that Blofeld is hiding out in Switzerland. This leads Bond on an undercover expedition to the villain's lair, where he uncoveres Blofeld's plot to poison the U.K.'s food supplies. Bond teams up with Draco to thwart Blofeld. The villain's organization is smashed, but Blofeld himself escapes. In the end, Bond and Tracy are married, but Blofeld assassinates Bond's new bride on their wedding day.
And here's where I make a startling confession: I've never actually watched ON HER MAJESTY'S SECRET SERVICE. It's a key installment in the Bond saga, but when I was a kid, it was just "the one without Sean Connery or Roger Moore" and I had no interest in it. I've seen bits and pieces here and there over the years, but surely no more than maybe thirty minutes in total of the entire film. Someday I'll sit down and check it out, but I don't know when. Perhaps when AI and Deepfake technology reach the point where United Artists can replace George Lazenby with Sean Connery. Surely that will happen in my lifetime!
Anyway -- since I typically compare the comic strip novel adaptation to the film, and since in this case I haven't seen the film, I'll simply note that the strip version of OHMSS is excellent. It features Bond's return to the Casino Royale, his first face-to-face meeting with Blofeld (they did not cross paths in THUNDERBALL), and plenty of suspense and intrigue as 007 lurks about Blofeld's Piz Gloria retreat in Switzerland. It's also quite expansive; easily the longest of all the Bond newspaper arcs I've looked at. Thanks to that, it feels more developed than some of the others. Thus far, it may be the crowning achievement by the regular creative team of Henry Gammidge and John McLusky.
And speaking of those creators, next week we'll move along to their swan song in YOU ONLY LIVE TWICE, followed by the debut of their successors in THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN.
Slight correction - the producer was Kevin McClory. Thunderball has the most complicated origin of any of the novels with a major impact on the film series. Firstly it's likely that a lot of the story actually came from Jack Whittingham (he seems to have written the actualy screenplay for the aborted film solo and is credited as such on the 1965 film) but he subsequently signed over all his rights to McClory and stepped down as co-plaintiff when McClory sued Fleming for copyright infringement. The result of the case settlement in late 1963 was that all future editions had to carry a credit of "based on a screen treatment by Kevin McClory, Jack Whittingham and Ian Fleming" in that order and that McClory had the film rights whilst Fleming retained the novel rights. Given the timing in all this I don't think the case had much bearing on the strip suddenly stopping - an attempted injunction against the novel's initial publication in 1961 was rejected by the High Court but with McClory retaining the right to further action which came later.
ReplyDelete(McClory collaborated with Eon to produce the 1965 film with a clause against any further adaptation for at least a decade. Then from the mid 1970s onwards he made repeated efforts to turn his rights into further Bond films with no involvement by Eon. This resulted in a series of legal cases that thrashed out variously exactly what he could make from his rights, that Eon could not use Blofeld and Spectre - though the 1980s Bond novels could - and there was even an attempt to claim ownership of the cinematic character of Bond that got thrown out. The only film to actually get produced was Never Say Never Again, a straight adaptation that in some places is closer to the book than the 1965 film. Eventually after McClory's death his estate sold the rights to Eon, finally unifying the whole canon and allowing recent films to use Spectre and Blofeld.)
Beaverbook was one of the biggest media proprietors of his generation, having built the Daily Express up to the point where it repeatedly broke world records for circulation in the 1930s, but the paper would go into a long term decline after his death, just a few weeks before the strip resumed publication.
And do watch the film of On Her Majesty's Secret Service soon. It's the single best film in the entire series.
Thank you, Tim! I don't know where I got Peter McCLory from. I've known it was Kevin for a very long time. I'll correct that.
DeleteI recall watching NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN once, probably when I was a teenager. It was an interesting experience. It was cool seeing an older Connery back in the Bond role, though it felt like "James Bond with the serial numbers filed off," as they say. Like, Connery felt right, but everything around him, including Rowan Atkinson, who I love, felt "off-brand".
The thing that fascinates me nowadays is knowing that Connery was roughly the same age as the "official" Bond, Roger Moore, at the time, and the movie made reference to Bond being long in the tooth, while Moore was still running around with no comment on his age despite the fact he was visibly quite older than his leading women by that point. (Though Maud Adams of that year's EON film, OCTOPUSSY, was nearly 40, which feels unusual for a "Bond Girl". It was nearly ten years after she had played Scaramanga's girlfriend in THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN!)
I really do plan to watch OHMSS... hey, it's Christmastime, and I know a chunk of the movie takes place during that timeframe -- maybe I should check it out right now!
When Moore last played Bond he was also older than David Niven when he played a retired Bond in the comedy version of Casino Royale (if you haven't seen that one, try to keep it that way). To some extent it was McClory and Connery that kept Moore around longer than he perhaps should. There was a real fear of a potential rival film, especially with Connery and Eon did what they could to bat it aside, including going all out to bring Moore back for each film in the early 1980s since his original contract had expired and he played hardball for each subsequent film to the point that alternatives were seriously considered and even screen tested as they believed they were safer with an established Bond than having a new actor go head to head, especially against Connery. (Eon also pointedly chose to assert that Blofeld and Spectre were not necessary for the films, hence the pre credit sequence of For Your Eyes Only.)
DeleteConnery may have been younger than Moore but not only did he now look older (although for Never Say Never Again he was back to clean shaven and a toupée) but it wasn't the first time he'd played an older version of an established hero trying to live up to past glories and legends amidst a new order with different demands, having previously done so as Robin Hood in 1976's Robin and Marian. But yes, Never Say Never Again feels off. To add to its problems it used a design and shooting style, plus either a film stock or a lousy VHS transfer, that made it wind up looking like a TV movie.
I think nearly all the Bond Girls (on at least the standard definition) have been younger than their Bonds (Honor Blackman and Diana Rigg spring to mind as the main exceptions) but certainly it was getting noticeable with Moore, although it wasn't always strictly linear. I think the record age gap is 30 years between Moore and Carole Bouquet (For Your Eyes Only) but that one doesn't get talked about so much (helped by Melina's mission of vengeance downplaying the romantic elements until the very end of the film whilst it also has Bond rejecting Bibi, played by an actress only a year younger than Bouquet). However the often cited story of Moore deciding to quit when during A View To A Kill he came to believe he was older than Tanya Roberts's mother was in fact based on misunderstandings. In fact Roberts's mother was actually about five years older than him but Roberts had cut six years off her official age which probably in turn dragged her mother's age forward. The actual age gap between Moore and Roberts was 22 years, smaller than the 24 years between him and Jane Seymour on his first film. There are some other age gaps around the same size or larger, though these tend to be for the secondary Bond Girl in films (22 years for Dalton and Talisa Soto on Licence to Kill, 26 for Brosnan and Rosamund Pike on Die Another Day) and the only primary one I can think of is 23 years between Connery and Kim Basinger on Never Say Never Again.
Maud Adams may have been cast again to fend off some of the age issues but also her character was written as having built up both the Octopussy cult and a thriving business/criminal operation, achievements that invariably make her older than either a daughter on a mission of vengeance or the heiress to an oil company or even an agent of another country.